The stress and resources of higher status hypotheses in light of COVID-19: Effects on work-life conflict and self-rated health

This paper explores the heterogeneous effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on employees' well-being regarding their work–life conflicts and self-rated health. Following the stress of higher status and resources of higher status hypotheses, we compared employees with and without supervisory responsibility. We used the third wave of a longitudinal linked employer–employee dataset (LEEP-B3) conducted in 2018/19 and a COVID-19 follow-up survey conducted in late 2020, providing information on 733 employees in establishments having more than 500 employees. Thus, we provide a longitudinal perspective covering the situation before the pandemic and possible pandemic-induced changes. We found that supervisory responsibility offered a comparative advantage for decreasing work–life conflict during the pandemic, but no such difference was detected among non-supervisors. However, there was no significant difference between employees with and without supervisory responsibility for self-rated health. Self-rated health status decreased during the pandemic in both groups to a similar degree. Our results indicate that having supervisory responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic can be a double-edged sword, acting as both a resource and a stressor when it comes to employees' work-life conflict and self-rated health. © 2023 Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH und Co. All rights reserved.

[German S1 Guideline Long-/Post-COVID]. / S1-Leitlinie Long-/Post-COVID.

The German Society of Pneumology initiated 2021 the AWMF S1 guideline Long COVID/Post-COVID. In a broad interdisciplinary approach, this S1 guideline was designed based on the current state of knowledge.The clinical recommendations describe current Long COVID/Post-COVID symptoms, diagnostic approaches, and therapies.In addition to the general and consensus introduction, a subject-specific approach was taken to summarize the current state of knowledge.The guideline has an explicit practical claim and will be developed and adapted by the author team based on the current increase in knowledge.

Organizing for supply chain resilience: a high reliability network perspective

Purpose: Both high reliability theory (HRT) and "new school” supply chain resilience (SCR) promote a multi-layered, adaptable, transformational, and holistic perspective on organizing and managing. The authors explore whether, and if so how, HRT offer fresh perspectives on the SCR challenges experienced during COVID-19 and on organizing for future resilience. Design/methodology/approach: Addressing SCR at the interorganizational network level, and blending theory synthesis and case study research, the authors assess if and how HRN constructs and practices can guide analysis of SCR in dynamic, complex networks, and help shape development pathways towards organizing for resilience. Findings draw on thick description and iterative coding of data (58 interviews and 200+ documents) on the buyer network responsible for managing the supply of critical medical products in the Netherlands. Findings: HRT highlights the interconnectedness of challenges encountered during COVID-19 and helps design future resilience through three lessons. Organizing for SCR requires (1) both anticipation and containment strategies, (2) stable working relationships characterized by trust, and (3) a clear basis of command underpinned by experience-based legitimacy. Originality/value: Distinctive from SCR, which views crises as "black swans”, HRT organizes around everyday consideration of the risk of failure. Taking a buyer network perspective, the authors move beyond the buyer-supplier network focus in SCR. The authors contend that emphasis on measures such as supplier base management, stockpiling, and domestic production are essential but not sufficient. Rather, HRT implies that deep structural and social ties within the buyer network should also be emphasized. © 2022, Esmee Peters, Louise Knight, Kees Boersma and Niels Uenk.

Organizing for supply chain resilience: a high reliability network perspective

PurposeBoth high reliability theory (HRT) and "new school" supply chain resilience (SCR) promote a multi-layered, adaptable, transformational, and holistic perspective on organizing and managing. The authors explore whether, and if so how, HRT offer fresh perspectives on the SCR challenges experienced during COVID-19 and on organizing for future resilience.Design/methodology/approachAddressing SCR at the interorganizational network level, and blending theory synthesis and case study research, the authors assess if and how HRN constructs and practices can guide analysis of SCR in dynamic, complex networks, and help shape development pathways towards organizing for resilience. Findings draw on thick description and iterative coding of data (58 interviews and 200+ documents) on the buyer network responsible for managing the supply of critical medical products in the Netherlands.FindingsHRT highlights the interconnectedness of challenges encountered during COVID-19 and helps design future resilience through three lessons. Organizing for SCR requires (1) both anticipation and containment strategies, (2) stable working relationships characterized by trust, and (3) a clear basis of command underpinned by experience-based legitimacy.Originality/valueDistinctive from SCR, which views crises as "black swans", HRT organizes around everyday consideration of the risk of failure. Taking a buyer network perspective, the authors move beyond the buyer-supplier network focus in SCR. The authors contend that emphasis on measures such as supplier base management, stockpiling, and domestic production are essential but not sufficient. Rather, HRT implies that deep structural and social ties within the buyer network should also be emphasized.

Challenges of Case Management of COVID-19 in University of Uyo Teaching Hospital: A One-Year Experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic. Older people and those with poorly controlled co-morbidities have higher risk of mortality. This study was conducted to highlight the clinical features, challenges of management and outcome for the patients we have seen in our centre over the past one year. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study involving all patients admitted in the COVID-19 Isolation unit of University of Uyo Teaching Hospital (UUTH) from June, 2020-May, 2021. Clinical and laboratory information were obtained from the patient case notes. Ethical clearance for the conduct of the study was obtained from the Ethics committee, UUTH, Uyo. Data was analysed with STATA version 13. RESULTS: Thirty-three (37.9%) patients were COVID-19 PCR positive. The mean ± SD age of COVID-19 PCR positive patients was 57.3 ± 13.4 years with majority (69.7%) being above 50 years. There was a male preponderance (75%). Eleven (34.4%) patients died while 21(65.6%) were discharged. The highest co-morbidity associated with COVID-19 mortality was diabetes mellitus (7 out of 11; 63.6%). There was a poor uptake of supportive investigations for the management of COVID-19 patients. A raised body temperature (P=0.0006), a low SPO2 (0.00004), high respiratory rate (0.0009) on admission and shorter duration of admission (0.0002), were associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: The presence of co-morbidities, fever, low SPO2 and high respiratory rates on admission are associated with increased mortality from COVID-19 disease. A paucity of supportive investigations was a major challenge to COVID-19 management. We therefore recommend the strengthening of our laboratory capacity.

CONTEXTE ET OBJECTIFS: La maladie de coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) est une pandémie mondiale. Les personnes âgées et celles qui présentent des comorbidités mal contrôlées ont un risque de mortalité plus élevé. Cette étude a été menée pour mettre en évidence les caractéristiques cliniques, les défis de la gestion et le résultat des patients que nous avons vus dans notre centre au cours de la dernière année. MÉTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une étude transversale rétrospective impliquant tous les patients admis dans l'unité d'isolement COVID- 19 de l'University of Uyo Teaching Hospital (UUTH) de juin 2020 à mai 2021. Les informations cliniques et de laboratoire ont été obtenues à partir des notes de cas des patients. L'autorisation éthique pour la réalisation de l'étude a été obtenue auprès du comité d'éthique de l'UUTH, Uyo. Les données ont été analysées avec STATA version 13. RÉSULTATS: Trente-trois (37,9%) patients étaient positifs à la PCR COVID-19. L'âge moyen ± SD des patients positifs au COVID-19 PCR était de 57,3 ± 13,4 ans, la majorité (69,7%) ayant plus de 50 ans. Il y avait une prépondérance masculine (75 %). Onze (34,4 %) patients sont décédés et 21 (65,6 %) sont sortis de l'hôpital. La comorbidité la plus importante associée à la mortalité de COVID-19 était le diabète miletus (7 sur 11 : 63 : 6 %). Les investigations de soutien pour la gestion des patients COVID-19 ont été peu utilisées. Une température corporelle élevée (P=0,0006), une faible SPO2 (0,00004), une fréquence respiratoire élevée (0,0009) à l'admission et une durée d'admission plus courte (0,0002) étaient associées à la mortalité. CONCLUSION: La présence de comorbidités, de fièvre, d'une faible SPO2 et d'une fréquence respiratoire élevée à l'admission est associée à une mortalité accrue de la maladie de COVID-19. Le manque d'investigations de soutien a été un défi majeur pour la gestion de la maladie COVID-19. Nous recommandons donc le renforcement de la capacité de nos laboratoires. Mots clés: COVID-19, défis, gestion des cas, Nigeria.

A Kraljic and competitive rivalry perspective on hospital procurement during a pandemic (COVID-19): a Dutch case study

Purpose - Procurement professionals widely use purchasing portfolio models to tailor purchasing strategies to different product groups needs. However, the application of these approaches in hospitals and the impact of a pandemic shock remain largely unknown. This paper aims to assess hospital purchasers' procurement strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic, the effects of factor-market rivalry (FMR) on strategies and the effectiveness of purchasing portfolio categorizations in this situation. Design/methodology/approach - This qualitative study of hospital purchasing in the Netherlands is supported by secondary data from official government publications. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 hospital purchasers at large hospitals. An interpretative approach is used to analyze the interviews and present the results. Findings - The findings reveal that product scarcity forces purchasers to treat them as (temporary) bottleneck items at the hospital level. The strategies adopted largely aligned with expected behavior based on Kraljic's commodity management model. Adding the FMR perspective to the model helped to further cluster crisis strategies into meaningful categories. Besides inventory management, increasing supply, reducing demand and increasing resource coordination were the other common strategies. An important finding is that purchasers and governments serve as gatekeepers in channeling FMR, thereby reducing potential harmful competition between and within hospitals. Social implications - The devastating experience of the COVID-19 pandemic is unveiling critics' weaknesses of public health-care provision in times of Crisis. This study assesses the strategies hospital purchasers apply to counteract shortages in the supply chain. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of gatekeepers in times of crisis and present strategies purchases can take to assure the supply of resources. Originality/value - No research has been conducted on purchasing portfolio models and FMR implications for hospitals during pandemics. Therefore, the authors offer several insights: increasing the supply risk creates temporary bottleneck strategies, letting purchasers adopt a short-terse perspetive and emphasizing the high mobility of commodities in the Kraljic commodity matrix. Additionally, despite more collaboration uncovered in other studies regarding COVID-19, strong rivalry arose at the beginning of the pandemic, leading to increased competition and less collaboration. Given such increased FMR, procurement managers and governments become important gatekeepers to balance resource allocation during pandemics both within and between hospitals.

Predicting poor outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 presenting to the Emergency Department (COVERED) - Development, internal and external validation of a prediction model

BACKGROUND: A recent systematic review recommends against the use of any of the current COVID-19 prediction models in clinical practice. To enable clinicians to appropriately profile and treat suspected COVID-19 patients at the emergency department (ED), externally validated models that predict poor outcome are desperately needed. OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to identify predictors of poor outcome, defined as mortality or ICU admission within 30 days, in patients presenting to the ED with a clinical suspicion of COVID-19, and to develop and externally validate a prediction model for poor outcome. METHODS: In this prospective, multi-center study, we enrolled suspected COVID-19 patients presenting at the EDs of two hospitals in the Netherlands. We used backward logistic regression to develop a prediction model. We used the area under the curve (AUC), Brier score and pseudo-R2 to assess model performance. The model was externally validated in an Italian cohort. RESULTS: We included 1193 patients between March 12 and May 27 2020, of whom 196 (16.4%) had a poor outcome. We identified 10 predictors of poor outcome: current malignancy (OR 2.774;95%CI 1.682-4.576), systolic blood pressure (OR 0.981;95%CI 0.964-0.998), heart rate (OR 1.001;95%CI 0.97-1.028), respiratory rate (OR 1.078;95%CI 1.046-1.111), oxygen saturation (OR 0.899;95%CI 0.850-0.952), body temperature (OR 0.505;95%CI 0.359-0.710), serum urea (OR 1.404;95%CI 1.198-1.645), C-reactive protein (OR 1.013;95%CI 1.001-1.024), lactate dehydrogenase (OR 1.007;95%CI 1.002-1.013) and SARS-CoV-2 PCR result (OR 2.456;95%CI 1.526-3.953). The AUC was 0.86 (95%CI 0.83-0.89), with a Brier score of 0.32 and, and R2 of 0.41. The AUC in the external validation in 500 patients was 0.70 (95%CI 0.65-0.75). CONCLUSION: The COVERED risk score showed excellent discriminatory ability, also in an external validation. It may aid clinical decision making, and improve triage at the ED in health care environments with high patient throughputs.